Unpaid Sales Commissions And The Illinois Sales Representative Act

The Illinois Sales Representative Act is a little known law which states that a principal who fails to pay a commission to a sales representative is liable for the commissions due, plus punitive damages up to 3 times the amount of the commissions owed to the sales representative, plus the sales representative’s reasonable attorney’s fees and court costs.

Typical plaintiffs include real estate agents, real estate brokers, sales representatives and manufacturers representatives.  It doesn’t matter what product or service was sold, so long as the remuneration was commission based.

If you are a sales representative and are owed commissions, we are highly experienced and can help you collect any unpaid commissions and enforce the Act so as to recover any attorneys’ fees and punitive damages.

We also regularly represent employers and principals who have been threatened with litigation.  In our many years of practice in this area, we have successfully asserted defenses available under the Act for our clients.

If you are an employer or a principal under the Act, call us to see how you can benefit from our many years of experience in this area.

If you are owed commissions, the Illinois Sales Representative Act might be just what you need to level the playing field.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

UNPAID OVERTIME CAN LAND THE BOSS IN HOT WATER

Some employers commit the following violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act intentionally to avoid paying overtime, while other employers fail to understand the extent of the law:

An employer miscalculates an employee’s regular rate of pay by failing to include in calculations bonus or other incentive pay for specific shifts worked
An employer does not include in hours worked time spent traveling for job purposes, including work related overnight stays, travel on the weekends, travel between work sites, and work related duties performed while commuting to and from work
An employer misclassifies an employee as exempt
An employer pays employees cash off the books without filling out W-2 forms and believes the lack of records alleviates the duty to pay overtime
An employer requests that an employee who works in excess of 40 hours one week take time off the following week to obtain an average of 40 hours worked per week
An employer requires an employee to seek medical attention during the workday for job related injuries, but fails to include time spent waiting for and receiving treatment in hours worked
An employer shortchanges an employee’s hours by not paying for short 5-20 minute breaks or for lunches spent working
An employer establishes a Collective Bargaining Agreement between the company and its employees that waives employees’ rights, including what hours must be counted as hours worked
An employer knows or has reason to know that an employee is continuing to work after hours and the employer is benefiting from work performed, but does not include the time in hours worked
An employer does not treat time that an employee spends correcting errors or mistakes in his or her work as time worked
An employer does not include in hours worked time that an employee spends waiting for work and is without a task, but is still required and allowed to be on the job

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Sheldon Lustig Admitted To Practice Before U.S. Supreme Court

Sheldon Lustig is a member of an elite group of attorneys who has been admitted to practice before the United States Supreme Court in Washington, D.C.  Mr. Lustig is a principal of Lustig & Associates.

Established in 1978, Lustig & Associates is a Chicago based law firm with a core practice platform in business, corporate law and litigation. They serve clients in the areas of general business law, corporations, limited liability companies, partnerships, business acquisitions and sales, family business interests, business disputes, debtor/creditor law, employment issues, personal and business bankruptcy, commercial litigation, financial services and marine interests.

For further information call Lustig & Associates at (847) 509-9090 or visit them on the web at www.Lustiglaw.Com.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Minimizing Business Startup Risks – Part 1

No business entreupeneur envisions a new business being chased by bill collectors or the tax man.  Yet, that’s exactly what happens to a large number of start up companies.

The business starts to experience turbulence, runs into problems paying its bills as they fall due and begins to falter.  The reasons are legion, but the results are predictably the same.

The failing business either goes out of business or becomes uncollectible. When that happens, the business creditors and the IRS sometimes look to the owners of the business.  If the business was not incorporated, it is likely that the owners will be personally liable for the obligations of the business.

However, this inherent entreupeneur liability can be minimized if the owners organize the business as a corporation or limited liability company at the outset.  The general rule is that the owners of corporations and limited liability companies are not personally liable for the general obligations of the business enterprise.

Consult with your legal adviser to determine whether one of these types of entities would be appropriate for your business.

For more information, please visit Lustig & Associates on the web at www.lustiglaw.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment